Legal AI Trust
AI Trust for privilege protection, conflict checks, and discovery-AI defensibility.
Built for legal AI risk
Legal-AI carries the hardest defensibility bar: privilege, conflicts, work-product doctrine, and the discovery rules that govern how AI-assisted review can be used in court. Infrarails combines a platform that monitors every AI interaction for privilege exposure with consulting that builds the policies your malpractice carrier + bar regulator will accept.
- Every AI interaction scored against legal-specific failure modes, not generic safety checks
- Mapped directly to the regulations your auditors cite — ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct and State Bar AI Ethics Opinions, among others
- Signed, replayable evidence built for the exact review your regulator or carrier will run
Privilege leakage via shared LLM context
Privileged communications mixed into a shared vendor LLM context — waiver risk across firm / client / matter boundaries.
Conflict-check failures from cross-matter retention
AI tools retaining context across matters without proper segregation; ethical-wall violations.
Hallucinated citations in client deliverables
AI surfacing non-existent case law in briefs / memos. Bar-discipline exposure and adverse rulings (e.g. Mata v. Avianca pattern).
Discovery-AI defensibility gaps
AI-assisted review that cannot be defended on the standard set by Da Silva Moore / Rio Tinto / subsequent rulings.
How legal teams run Infrarails
One policy, scoped to your legal obligations — evaluated on every AI interaction, not just at audit time.
curl -X POST https://api.infrarails.ai/v1/evaluate \
-H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_KEY" \
-d '{"policy": "legal_compliance", "prompt": "...", "response": "..."}'Guard
Privilege-aware redaction at every LLM call; matter-boundary enforcement
Monitor
Citation + hallucination detection on every AI-generated brief / memo
Govern
Bar-compliant AI Use Policy, ethical-wall configuration, audit trail for malpractice carrier
Documents
Privilege-aware document processing + HITL review for high-risk matters
Regulatory Mapping
Every AI system in your legal estate mapped against the frameworks your regulators actually cite — kept current as the rules change.
Audit-Ready Evidence
Every evaluation produces a signed, tamper-evident record — the artifact your auditors, examiners, or carrier will ask to see.
ABA Model Rules of Professional ConductState Bar AI Ethics OpinionsFederal Rules of Civil ProcedureEU AI ActPrivilege + Work Product Doctrines
What a typical legal engagement looks like
Anonymised profile drawn from sector patterns — not a specific client.
Profile
AmLaw 100 firm deploying GenAI across litigation + corporate practice groups
Drivers
- Pre-emptive bar inquiry response on AI use
- Malpractice-carrier AI questionnaire ahead of policy renewal
- Partner-level governance committee mandate after a near-miss citation hallucination
Bundle
AI Governance Framework Design (8 weeks, with bar-rule mapping) → AI Readiness Assessment (3 weeks, focused on shadow-AI across practice groups) → AI Red Team Engagement on the litigation GenAI tool (6 weeks)
Outcome
Firm-wide AI Use Policy aligned to ABA + state bar opinions, ethical-wall enforcement on the platform, malpractice-carrier evidence package, and documented citation-hallucination guardrails in production.
Talk to the Legal practice
60-90 minute scoping call, routed to the legal practice lead. Free.